Three Blind Mice

Two blogs ago, I decided to review the top end CD players: the MHZS CD 88, the Shanling CD 300 (or for an extra $5o0 you can have an extra zero for a CD 3000) and the Doge 6. Today its the MHZS CD 33, BADA HD22 and the Shanling T-80.

Taking a blind test on these is like having someone blind fold you, then taking you on a plane, train or automobile and asking, "which one are you in?" They are all different - completely different- and reviewing them was an interesting endeavor.

Take the MHZS CD 33. The 33 uses the same chip as the 66 and 88 but a different transport and output buffer topology. We replaced the stock Chinese 6N3 tubes with GE 5670s. The MHZS 33 is, I now declare, the best value in CD player history. It has the sonic characteristics of the Shanling CD 300 (or, if you want an extra zero and have $500 to spare - CD 3000) and the life like presentation of its older siblings. Complex dynamic passages lose their edge, pianos sound life-like and vocals are precise. It does not however, have the last word in detail. So the MHZS places you about 15 rows back in the orchestra hall where the congeal of the orchestra, no matter how complex, makes it way over to your ears.

Witness the Bada HD-22. The HD 22 is the boldest of the group. It has the dynamics of the Doge 6 and the detail of the MHZS CD 88. Its dynamic presentation and un-veiled push is fun to listen to. With complex jazz and rock the player places itself in first place as it pumps bass and drives a frontal presentation of the midrange. While the BADA HD-22 is the most fun, its boldness is not always easy to listen to. As a side effect - small quartets and small jazz ensembles come through with uncanny realism and life like performance. As a matter of fact, if this is what I listened to all the time I would own the Bada, no question.

Then there is the Shanling T-80. The T-80 want to be a solid state CD player. It really does. It is dead neutral across the entire spectrum and has uncanny detail for a CD player in the $500 price range. (P.S. I have not found one with an extra zero, so for those of you who insist on spending the extra $500, you may have to wait for the Shanling t-800). The bass is firm and does not have the ripeness of the 33 nor the push of HD-22. If you listen to music that is across the spectrum, the the T-80 is the one for you. Replace the 6N3 tubes and it becomes even more neutral while gently imparting a high gloss over the upper midrange and a slight emphasis in the lower midrange.

So let me some it up with James Taylor, Janis Ian and the latest release from the Jone's Street Boys:

• For the MHZS the line up (James, Taylor, Janis Ian and the Jones Street Boys) were in a small cozy night club with a nice set of tube amps,
• For the Bada - they were at Ravinia Park (an outside theater) and I had a front seat, and
  
• For the Shanling T-80 (or for $500 we will add the extra zero - T-800), you were in the studio with these cats.

All the best,
Vic

Amer-A-Chord

When I was a small boy growing up in Skokie, IL my parents had, ever since I could remember, a Telefunken console Hi Fi. It was a big wood thing with a Phono, Am/FM/Short Wave and speakers running along the bottom. It was pure mono. I would peak around the back, after I turned it on, to watch the tubes glow. I am guessing, at this point, that they were probably EL84 tubes. The sound that it produced was as smooth as silk, a little shy on the bass and lacking dynamics.The mid range, especially vocals, were unbelievable.

I also remember going over to some friends that my parents had at the time and got a chance to poke around the back, of what was the largest hi fi console I had ever seen in my life, a Fisher console - vacuum tube, of course. The Fisher produced wonderful EL4 based sound.

Just as I was done playing ball one day, we went over to a friends house for some kool aid, and there it was. I never seen anything like it. It floated the LP on a chassis that was suspended, what seemed to be mid air. The platter was as large as the disc. It said, "AR, Inc" on a brass palate that was attached to a wood plinth. It sat upon an H. H. Scott integrated tube amplifier and fed an Electrovoice speaker pushed in a corner. My fried played "Cecilia" from Simon & Garfunkel's Bridge Over Troubled Water and I never, ever, to this day, heard such an ass kicking low end.

Growing up in the Skokie - Evanston area there were many high end stores to choose from as there still are today. There was a chance for a hobbyist and even a novice to get decent sound.

Now I live in another suburb of Chicago and I am afraid that my children will never experience Telefunken/Fisher/ AR, Inc hi fi that I once had. When they go over to their friends houses, they have something they bought on sale or worse yet, a TV / AV system they purchased at Best Buy. The sound is never smooth, there is nothing innovative from a sound quality point of view and nobody really cares what it sounds like, just how it looks. Such is the strip mall like hi fi land that they live in. Their friends see the tubes and weird looking speakers in our house, but no one is interested. Maybe its because it does not get 330 HDTV channels.

Such is the past, such is my child hood. I have very few friends who have a decent stereo in their homes or even have the inkling in purchasing one. Before my wife's grandmother passed away, she had a Grundig console sitting in her living room. "I suppose I should get rid of this big thing", she quipped, "But it just produces such good sound, and I can't buy anything that sounds like it"

Now she does not know anything about cables, power conditioning or DACs - but she does know good sound, and she too is part of the past.